Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a situated behavioral-data (B-data) framework to analyze and control the behavioral styles of large language models (LLMs) in interactive settings, addressing the limitations of traditional self-report questionnaires. By constructing 3,200 contrastive scenarios across 20 behavioral patterns and four prompt registers, the authors demonstrate that LLMs exhibit stable, model-specific behavioral profiles that can be manipulated through Behavioral Mode Axes (BMAs). The findings reveal that LLM personality-like tendencies are measurable and controllable, challenging the notion of abstract self-report traits in favor of concrete behavioral modes grounded in interaction contexts.
LLMs can be fine-tuned to exhibit specific behavioral styles, revealing that personality-like traits are not just abstract concepts but measurable and controllable modes of interaction.
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act in interactive settings where their behavioral styles affect user experience, safety, and downstream decision making. Existing LLM personality studies largely rely on self-report questionnaires administered in first-person settings, making the resulting profiles sensitive to surface elicitation choices and poorly grounded in concrete model behavior. In this work, we introduce a situated behavioral-data (B-data) framework for studying and controlling LLM behavioral personality. We construct 3,200 contrastive behavioral scenarios spanning 20 behavioral patterns and four prompt registers, grounded in validated psychometric facets such as BFI-2, DOSPERT, and HEXACO. Using this framework, we find that LLMs exhibit stable and model-specific behavioral profiles, while also revealing register-dependent shifts across first-person decisions, advice-giving, and task execution. We then show that these behavioral patterns can be controlled through Behavioral Mode Axes (BMAs), activation-space directions derived from contrastive behavioral traces. Compared with response-derived BMAs, which are more prone to trait drift, thought-derived BMAs more faithfully capture the intended behavioral mechanism and provide cleaner control over situated behavioral styles. Our results suggest that LLM personality-like tendencies are better understood not as abstract self-report traits, but as measurable and controllable behavioral modes grounded in concrete interaction contexts. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/lhz191/LLM-Behavioral-Personality.
