Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper uncovers a significant architectural vulnerability in proprietary large language model (LLM) APIs, where encrypted reasoning traces can be exploited across different models and sessions within a provider's ecosystem. By injecting these encrypted traces into less secure models, the authors demonstrate a scalable decryption jailbreak that allows for the extraction of proprietary reasoning, large-scale private data, and hazardous information. The findings highlight four distinct attack vectors, including the circumvention of anti-distillation mechanisms and the potential for invisible prompt injections, emphasizing the urgent need for improved security measures.
Exploiting a vulnerability in LLM APIs allows attackers to extract proprietary reasoning and sensitive data without directly breaching the more capable models.
Leading large language model providers now conceal their models'step-by-step reasoning, or chain-of-thought, to protect intellectual property and limit information leakage. Rather than storing these traces server-side, providers return them to the client as blocks of encrypted text, which the client passes back with each subsequent request. Building on prior research, we identify an architectural vulnerability: these encrypted blocks are fully compatible and interchangeable across different sessions, users, and models within a provider's ecosystem. We exploit this compatibility to develop a scalable decryption jailbreak. By injecting an encrypted reasoning trace from a given model into a weaker, and less safeguarded model from the same provider, we force it to decode and output the trace verbatim in plaintext, without ever jailbreaking the more capable model directly. This vulnerability enables four distinct attack vectors. First, it circumvents anti-distillation mechanisms, allowing adversaries to extract a proprietary model's reasoning, as we demonstrate across Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. Second, it allows for large-scale private data extraction. Developers frequently share session logs publicly, unaware of contents of the encrypted blocks. By decoding 315,320 reasoning blocks scraped from public repositories, we recovered 367 Personally Identifiable Information (PII) artifacts and 182 credentials. Third, it inadvertently reveals hazardous information hidden within the reasoning process, even in cases where the model's final, visible output safely rejects a malicious request. Fourth, attackers can leverage this flaw to execute invisible prompt injections, embedding malicious payloads entirely within encrypted blocks to poison public agentic rollouts. Following responsible disclosure, we propose concrete cryptographic and system-level mitigations to secure client-side reasoning.
DeepMind