Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces RynnValue, a novel open-source value foundation model for robotic manipulation that leverages temporal distance as a supervision mechanism, enabling it to scale to over 7,000 hours of instruction-conditioned data without relying on preference or progress annotations. By employing techniques such as random temporal sampling and value-isolation attention, RynnValue effectively mitigates the risk of shortcuts that could compromise learning reliability. The model achieves a Kendall's tau_a of 0.675 on RBM-EVAL-OOD, outperforming preference-supervised benchmarks and significantly improving real-world policy success rates both online and offline.
RynnValue shows that using temporal distance as a supervision target can outperform traditional preference-based methods in robotic learning, achieving higher accuracy and broader generalization.
General-purpose reward models are increasingly the bottleneck for scaling robot learning, yet the recipe for learning value-related capabilities from large-scale heterogeneous corpora remains underexplored. Existing approaches tie supervision to task-internal anchors such as preferences or normalized progress, none of which transfer cleanly across embodiments and data sources. We introduce RynnValue, an open-source value foundation model for robotic manipulation that replaces these anchors with temporal distance, the directed cost-to-go from an observation to the language-specified goal. Because temporal-distance labels can be derived directly from timestamps, RynnValue scales to over 7,000 hours and roughly 3M instruction-conditioned clips without preference or progress annotations. To make temporal-value learning reliable at scale, we combine random temporal sampling, temporal-order shuffling, and value-isolation attention, suppressing shortcuts that would leave predictions insensitive to failures and regressions. Trained without preference labels, RynnValue attains an average Kendall's tau_a of 0.675 on RBM-EVAL-OOD, surpassing the fully preference-supervised state of the art (0.655) and more than doubling a progress-only counterpart (0.292), while generalizing zero-shot to unseen tasks, embodiments, and viewpoints. Converted into dense rewards via potential-based shaping, it raises real-world policy success from 52.5% to 72.5% online and from 63.8% to 82.5% offline. These results establish temporal distance as a scalable supervision target and practical reward interface for generalist robot policies.
