Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates various data-driven methods for imputing missing radius of maximum winds (Rmax) values in tropical cyclone datasets, focusing on one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (1DCNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and traditional machine learning techniques. By incorporating physics-informed input augmentation and emphasizing temporal modeling, the research shows that temporal models significantly outperform non-temporal models in preserving Rmax variability, even with fewer samples, particularly when other storm-size predictors are missing. The findings underscore the critical role of accurate Rmax imputation for enhancing coastal hazard assessments, demonstrating that including the radius of 34-knot winds (R34) can substantially boost model performance.
Temporal deep learning methods can effectively reconstruct missing tropical cyclone parameters, revealing a surprising resilience in Rmax variability preservation with fewer data samples.
Probabilistic coastal hazard assessments require accurate characterization of tropical cyclone (TC) parameters, yet datasets often contain missing records for the radius of maximum winds (Rmax), a key variable in Joint Probability Method analyses. This study evaluates data-driven approaches for Rmax imputation, including one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (1DCNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and conventional machine learning models. We examine physics-informed input augmentation, temporal modeling, and transfer learning using synthetic RAFT and STORM datasets for pre-training and observational IBTrACS data for fine-tuning. Including the radius of 34-knot winds (R34) substantially improves performance across all model types. Temporal models achieve higher average correlations than non-temporal models despite using approximately an order of magnitude fewer samples, indicating better preservation of relative Rmax variability across storms. This advantage is more pronounced when R34 is unavailable, suggesting temporal information can partially compensate for missing storm-size predictors. Transfer learning does not improve performance, likely because synthetic datasets have lower and less variable Rmax distributions than IBTrACS. These findings demonstrate the potential of temporal deep learning for reconstructing incomplete TC records and highlight the importance of physics-informed inputs, observational data availability, and distributional consistency in coastal hazard assessment.
