Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Contextual-Intersectional Fairness Auditing Framework (CIFA), which identifies vulnerabilities in visual models by analyzing the interactions between demographic and contextual factors. The study reveals that traditional fairness evaluations can obscure significant performance disparities among hidden subgroups, particularly in face analysis tasks. By applying CIFA to gender classification across multiple datasets, the authors demonstrate that existing mitigation strategies fail to consistently address these disparities, highlighting the necessity for a more nuanced approach to fairness auditing.
Hidden subgroup vulnerabilities in face analysis can lead to substantial performance disparities that traditional fairness metrics overlook.
Fairness evaluation in computer vision commonly relies on aggregate accuracy and demographic subgroup analysis. However, visual models are also sensitive to contextual factors such as illumination, blur, image quality, facial accessories, and appearance attributes. These factors may interact with demographic characteristics, producing hidden subgroups in which performance degrades substantially despite strong aggregate accuracy and apparently acceptable demographic fairness. To address this, we propose the Contextual-Intersectional Fairness Auditing Framework (CIFA), a structured framework for identifying subgroup vulnerabilities arising from interactions between demographic and contextual attributes. CIFA performs demographic, contextual, and contextual-intersectional auditing, followed by worst-group discovery to identify and rank the most vulnerable attribute combinations. We evaluate CIFA on gender classification using ResNet-50 \cite{he2016deep} and ViT-B/16 \cite{dosovitskiy2020image} across FairFace \cite{Karkkainen2021}, CelebA \cite{Liu2015}, and UTKFace \cite{Zhang2017}. Our results show that aggregate accuracy and demographic-only evaluation can mask substantial contextual-intersectional disparities. We further assess several established mitigation strategies through an audit--mitigate--reaudit protocol and find that, although some worst-group disparities are reduced, no single strategy consistently eliminates them across datasets and architectures. These findings establish contextual-intersectional auditing as an important component of fairness evaluation and provide a reproducible framework for discovering, prioritizing, and reassessing hidden subgroup risks in face analysis systems.
