Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the simplification of interpretable classifiers in finance, starting from a single equation and progressively transforming it into more readable formats such as pruned monomials and if-then rules. The authors demonstrate that while pruning features from the model incurs minimal predictive loss, it can significantly enhance readability, with human assessments confirming improved comprehension across different professional backgrounds. Notably, the study quantifies the trade-offs between fidelity and performance, revealing that simpler rules can effectively classify without needing to replicate the original model's complexity.
Simplifying financial decision-making models can enhance readability without sacrificing predictive power, challenging the notion that more complexity always yields better performance.
In regulated domains such as finance, a model that cannot be explained cannot be deployed, yet many interpretable classifiers defeat their own purpose by producing formulas with dozens of features that no regulator could read. We take the reverse direction. Starting from an interpretable classifier expressed as a single equation over the input features, we progressively simplify it into more readable forms, including a pruned monomial, a directional if--then rule, and the integer scorecards and tallies that finance already deploys. Because the equation is itself the predictive model rather than a post-hoc explanation we can directly quantify what is lost under each simplification. Across four financial datasets, we find that pruning is nearly free and that fidelity can erode faster than predictive performance, allowing simpler rules to remain effective classifiers without faithfully reproducing the original model. A human assessment shows that simplification improves perceived readability, while preferences for different representations vary by professional background. Beyond measuring these losses empirically, we show that some can be anticipated from the original model: we derive a bound on the change caused by pruning and predict how faithfully a rule retaining only the direction of each feature's effect preserves the original ranking.
