Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the lifecycle paradox in Software-Defined Defence (SDD), where the rapid evolution of software contrasts with the slow procurement cycles of defense platforms. It proposes a continuous DevOps-style loop that integrates civilian technologies into defense systems through model-based systems engineering, tactical connectivity, and ongoing compliance management. The key finding emphasizes that leveraging proven capabilities from sectors like automotive and manufacturing can facilitate a resilient SDD, provided that these methods are validated under adversarial conditions.
Closing the gap between rapid software evolution and slow defense procurement could redefine military readiness and operational effectiveness.
Military capability is increasingly determined by software. Yet defence platforms are procured on decade-long timescales, while the software and AI models they carry must evolve in days or hours. This paper calls this mismatch the lifecycle paradox, and argues it is the central problem Software-Defined Defence (SDD) must solve. SDD rests on three dimensions: software and systems engineering (design, procurement, certification), AI engineering (sovereignty and trust of learned components), and connectivity and infrastructure engineering (timely exchange of information among sensors, AI, and operators). The proposed path to resilient SDD starts from civilian technologies, addressed through a continuous, DevOps-style loop: model-based systems engineering and simulation-based testing front-load design and verification; tactical connectivity and low-power edge execution carry that design into contested operation; continuous compliance, assurance, and variability management run as cross-cutting concerns. This loop is sustainable given capabilities already proven in automotive, manufacturing, space, and energy. The next step is validating them under adversarial or defence-certified conditions, with short-, medium-, and long-term paths to closing gaps. Closing the SDD gap while preserving civic benefits is a distributed responsibility: researchers must redirect methods toward adversarial conditions; industry must expose tooling to operational needs; policymakers must shape regulatory instruments; and defence agencies must validate results with operators. Recommendations span three horizons: a short-term baseline of adversarial testing and connectivity pilots; a medium-term pipeline of incremental certification; and a long-term validation closing the loop under operational conditions.
