Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel approach for temporal retrieval that utilizes query-difficulty-gated fusion of reasoning views to enhance the relevance of retrieved documents based on temporal reasoning rather than lexical similarity. By analyzing an eight-dimensional signature of score distributions and employing a gating mechanism with around one thousand parameters, the method dynamically adjusts the contribution of different query reformulations based on their reliability. The approach significantly improves retrieval performance across various models on the Tempo benchmark, particularly benefiting weaker backbone architectures, achieving notable gains in nDCG@10 metrics.
Query-difficulty-gated fusion reveals that not all reformulations are equal, leading to significant improvements in temporal retrieval accuracy.
Reasoning-intensive temporal retrieval requires matching a query to documents whose relevance depends on shared temporal reasoning rather than lexical overlap. Expanding a query into several reformulations that make its temporal intent explicit, and retrieving with each, supplies this reasoning, but fusing the resulting rankings with equal weights wastes accuracy: for any single query, only some reformulations are reliable. We propose query-difficulty-gated fusion of reasoning views. From each view we read an eight-dimensional signature of its score distribution, built from query-performance-prediction quantities such as softmax entropy, score gaps, and dispersion, and a gate of roughly one thousand parameters maps these signatures to per-query view weights. The fused ranking uses no relevance labels at inference, no re-ranking, and no fine-tuning of the retriever; the gate is trained leave-one-task-out. On the \textsc{Tempo} benchmark, the method improves all six retrievers we evaluate, from BERT encoders to 7B decoder retrievers, with the largest gains on the weaker backbones. The strongest retrievers reach $0.297$ and $0.303$ nDCG@10, and the per-query gain over the original query is significant under a paired bootstrap ($p<0.001$). A per-query oracle reaches $0.364$ against our realized $0.297$, exposing headroom that identifies per-query view selection as a concrete next step.
