Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces the Nimblemind Multi-Agent System (nMAS), a novel pipeline for automated feature engineering in heart failure research, addressing the significant workload associated with electronic health record (EHR) data integration. By evaluating nMAS on 500 dummy patient records, the authors generated 132 structured and 70 rubric-scored aggregated features, which significantly enhanced predictive performance for heart failure phenotyping, as indicated by improved AUROC scores. The findings highlight the potential for nMAS to streamline the feature engineering process while ensuring evidence traceability and methodological rigor in clinical AI applications.
Automated feature engineering for heart failure can boost predictive accuracy by over 7% while maintaining rigorous evidence standards.
Electronic health record (EHR) feature engineering is a major bottleneck in clinical research and AI, accounting for 39-45% of data scientists'workload. This is especially pronounced in heart failure, which affects an estimated 6.7 million U.S. adults and requires integrating fragmented EHR data with disease-specific, guideline-based clinical reasoning. Existing rule-based and large language model (LLM)-based approaches offer only partial automation with limited maintainability and evidence traceability. We developed the Nimblemind Multi-Agent System (nMAS), an evidence-linked, rubric-grounded pipeline for automated heart-failure feature engineering, and evaluated it on 500 dummy patient records from nine EHR source tables. nMAS generated 132 structured and 70 rubric-scored aggregated features, verified for structural integrity, rubric compliance, and provenance, and audited by a restricted LLM. Adding the aggregated features improved held-out AUROC from 0.895 to 0.963 for HFrEF and 0.870 to 0.910 for HFpEF phenotyping, and an independent LLM-based rubric assessment of evidence support and methodological soundness scored the features at 81.5% of maximum points. These results demonstrate the feasibility of automated, auditable feature engineering for complex cardiovascular EHR data, though evaluation was limited to a single-institution cohort and external validation is needed.
