Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the efficacy of test-time refinement strategies in LiDAR semantic scene completion by comparing an iterative refinement model with a wider one-shot predictor and a weight-tied multigrid refiner. The results reveal that the iterative system significantly outperforms the wider predictor in scenarios involving coherent region removal, achieving a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) improvement of 0.911 points, while demonstrating the limitations of iteration under independent thinning and additive clutter. The findings suggest that the choice between iteration and widening should be informed by the specific characteristics of the evidence geometry, rather than assuming a one-size-fits-all advantage for iterative methods.
Iterative refinement in LiDAR scene completion can yield significant improvements in specific contexts, but it鈥檚 not a universal solution鈥攇eometry matters.
Should a completion model spend extra test-time compute by iterating, or spend a similar parameter budget on a wider one-shot predictor? The answer is easily confounded by denoising curricula, corruption augmentation, capacity, and unpaired evaluation. We study this question in LiDAR semantic scene completion by comparing a one-shot predictor, a parameter-matched wider predictor, and a weight-tied multigrid refiner initialized from the same frozen predictor. The protocol separates coherent region removal, independent thinning, range-dependent attenuation, and additive clutter while preserving exact scene-condition pairing. Across five training seeds and 815 SemanticKITTI sequence-08 frames, the full iterative system improves mIoU over the wide control by 0.911 points under contiguous angular removal, with a 95% moving-block bootstrap interval of [0.804, 1.040] that clears a predeclared 0.5-point practical margin. Under independent 75% thinning, iteration adds only 0.300 points [0.166, 0.436], whereas observation-family augmentation adds 5.975 points [5.662, 6.140]. Neither intervention repairs additive clutter. The iterative system also costs 10.74 ms and 0.75 GiB per frame, versus 6.25 ms and 0.23 GiB for the wide control. These results establish a geometry-conditioned empirical boundary rather than a universal advantage: coherent gaps can justify fixed-depth refinement, broadly thinned evidence is addressed more effectively by training coverage, and spurious evidence requires a different robustness mechanism.
