Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the critical issue of disengagement among core contributors in Open Source Software (OSS) projects by developing a competence model that evaluates contributors' skills through code metrics derived from their contributions. The authors highlight the challenges of identifying and training new contributors due to insufficient understanding of their competence levels, which can jeopardize project sustainability. By implementing a systematic assessment of competences, the study provides a framework for effectively identifying and nurturing potential contributors, ultimately enhancing project resilience.
Accurately assessing contributor competences could be the key to revitalizing disengaged OSS projects and ensuring their long-term viability.
Contributors to Open Source Software (OSS) projects are vital to maintaining the health of both communities and projects. However, the number of projects experiencing core contributors' disengagement has increased to the point that it risks the projects' survival. Finding new contributors to replace the workforce is challenging and time-intensive due to several factors, including a lack of precise knowledge about potential candidates' competences, which may need to be confirmed through interviews and exams. Previous studies provided indications of the contributor's competences, although they lack depth in understanding competence levels, which can result in poor knowledge about the contributor's capabilities. To address this gap, we assess contributors' competence by collecting code metrics related to source code from contributions. We also propose a competence model able to predict the competence level required to solve tasks. By properly assessing contributors' competences, we can identify and train candidates to replace core contributors. Our replication package, including code, data, and documentation, is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21605122
