Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces DASyR-LLM, an LLM-guided symbolic regression framework designed to enhance kinetic model discovery in chemical engineering by integrating domain knowledge into the search process. By embedding a large language model within an iterative symbolic regression algorithm, the framework critiques candidate models and proposes new expressions, significantly reducing the number of iterations required to identify the correct model structure by 41.7-79.3%. The results indicate that the LLM not only accelerates the discovery process but also maintains high predictive performance, achieving an R虏 greater than 0.98 across various complex case studies.
LLMs can cut kinetic model discovery iterations by up to 79% while maintaining high predictive accuracy, revolutionizing the efficiency of chemical engineering research.
Kinetic model discovery is a central challenge in chemical engineering, as accurate rate expressions are essential for understanding and controlling chemical and biological processes. Symbolic regression (SR) has emerged as a powerful data-driven approach for identifying interpretable kinetic models, but usually operates without domain knowledge, often exploring physicochemically implausible models. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue for injecting domain expertise into this search. Here, we introduce an LLM-guided SR framework, embedding an LLM module within an iterative SR algorithm for automated kinetic model discovery. The LLM performs two roles at each iteration: (1) a qualitative physicochemical critique of the best SR candidates, and (2) the proposal of new candidate rate expressions guided by the SR-generated models and embedded chemical knowledge. Our framework is evaluated on four in silico case studies of increasing complexity, spanning heterogeneous catalysis and bioprocess systems. Results show the LLM-guided framework reduces iterations to identify the ground-truth model by $41.7-79.3\%$ versus a state-of-the-art SR framework, with the LLM directly proposing the correct model structure in over half of the guided runs. In practical settings, where each iteration typically requires a new wet-lab experiment, this translates into a substantial reduction in experimental effort. Predictive performance on an independent validation set is equivalent between both approaches, with $R^2>0.98$ in all case studies. Ablation studies indicate that both the SR component and the LLM scale contribute to this performance, with a reduced-size LLM largely retaining discovery efficiency. These findings demonstrate that LLMs can effectively inject domain knowledge into scientific model discovery, paving the way toward fully automated, domain-aware kinetic modelling pipelines.
