Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the role of verbalized confidence in enabling risk-controlled deferral in small language models, assessing eleven instruction-tuned models across various parameter sizes on two benchmark tasks. The authors establish theoretical limits on calibration techniques, revealing that while temperature scaling is ineffective for certain confidence-accuracy scenarios, a Clopper-Pearson procedure can yield finite-sample risk certificates under specific assumptions. Empirical results show that, despite effective calibration methods like Platt scaling, only a minority of model-task pairs achieve certified autonomy within a 20% risk budget, highlighting the challenges of deploying small models safely.
Certified deferral reveals that even well-calibrated small language models struggle to meet safety thresholds in risk-sensitive applications.
Small open-weight language models increasingly run in private, offline, and cost-sensitive settings, where the key deployment question is not only what a model answers but when it should defer to a human. We study whether verbalized confidence can support risk-controlled deferral, evaluating eleven instruction-tuned models from three families, 0.5B to 14B parameters, on ARC-Challenge and TruthfulQA with 25,168 local predictions. Three theoretical results delimit what calibration can provide: strictly monotone calibration preserves the risk-coverage frontier and error-detection AUROC; temperature scaling cannot calibrate models whose confidence stays above one half while accuracy falls below it; and a Clopper-Pearson procedure converts a 200-question calibration set into a finite-sample risk certificate under an i.i.d. deployment assumption. Empirically, eight of 22 model-task pairs hit the temperature-scaling infeasibility floor within one percentage point of the predicted bound. Platt scaling reduces ECE to as low as 0.02, yet certified autonomy at a 20% risk budget is granted to only three model-task pairs and to none at 10%. We also identify and repair an answer-ordering artifact in the multiple-choice form of TruthfulQA. Calibration gives confidence semantics; certified deferral determines when small models are safe to use.
