Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a methodology that utilizes a Large Language Model (LLM) to detect hardware security vulnerabilities in Verilog designs, addressing the critical challenge of identifying flaws that become permanent after fabrication. By evaluating the approach iteratively on a dataset of single-module Verilog designs, the authors demonstrate that LLMs can effectively identify vulnerabilities categorized under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) framework. The key result shows that LLMs can significantly enhance traditional hardware security analysis, offering automated and scalable solutions for vulnerability detection during the design phase.
LLMs can revolutionize hardware security by autonomously identifying vulnerabilities in Verilog designs before they become embedded in silicon.
Hardware designs, like software, are susceptible to bugs that can introduce security vulnerabilities and create opportunities for malicious exploitation. Unlike software vulnerabilities, however, hardware flaws become permanently embedded in silicon after fabrication, making them difficult or impossible to patch. Many of these weaknesses are categorized under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) framework and include improper access control, exposure of sensitive information, and unintended privilege escalation. To improve the detection of such vulnerabilities, we propose a methodology that leverages a Large Language Model (LLM) to identify potential hardware CWEs directly from hardware designs in Verilog. The proposed approach is evaluated iteratively on a dataset of single-module Verilog designs to assess its effectiveness in detecting hardware security weaknesses. Our results demonstrate the potential of LLMs to augment traditional hardware security analysis by providing automated, scalable assistance for identifying security vulnerabilities during the hardware design process.
