Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study critically analyzes the grammatical status of preverbal uninflected and underived roots in Mapudungun, particularly focusing on the root wuno 'return/re-'. By conducting a diachronic corpus analysis over four centuries, the authors identify three distinct profiles of these elements and confirm the status of certain roots as full lexical verbs. The findings challenge existing classifications and propose a novel prosodic-orthographic hypothesis, suggesting that historical transcription practices have influenced current syntactic interpretations.
The study reveals that historical transcription practices have led to misinterpretations of grammatical structures in Mapudungun, reshaping our understanding of its syntax.
This study examines the grammatical status of preverbal uninflected and underived roots in Mapudungun, with particular focus on wuno 'return/re-'. Through a critical review of scholarly classifications--auxiliaries (Smeets, 2008), modal prefixes (Longkon, 2011), and preverbal particles/complex verb stems (Z煤帽iga, 2006)--we demonstrate the limitations of existing frameworks. A diachronic corpus analysis spanning four centuries (1606-present) reveals that these elements exhibit three distinct profiles: stable V1 compounds (kim, shinge), volatile V1 rates reflecting orthographic shift (pepi, wuno), and a true particle (kalli). The discovery of V2 attestations for kim and kupa confirms their status as full lexical verbs. We propose a prosodic-orthographic hypothesis: apparent "variable binding" results from the fossilization of prosodic pauses transcribed by early missionaries as spaces, a convention later reanalysed by speakers as syntactic boundaries. The evidence supports Z煤帽iga's radical concatenation as the correct grammatical model, with implications for the study of languages with no pre-contact written tradition.
