Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces nonparametric goodness-of-fit testing methods that address covariate shift by evaluating how well a model trained on a source population applies to a target population. By leveraging truncated importance-weighting kernel ridge regression and a multiplier bootstrap, the authors create robust confidence sets for regression functions, even under challenging conditions like heavy-tailed density ratios. The results demonstrate nonasymptotic validity and provide explicit error rates, significantly enhancing the reliability of goodness-of-fit assessments in practical applications.
Confidence sets for regression functions can remain valid even when faced with heavy-tailed distributions, challenging traditional assumptions in goodness-of-fit testing.
This paper develops procedures for nonparametric goodness-of-fit testing under covariate shift, where labelled data are drawn from a source population but goodness-of-fit is evaluated for a target population. The distribution mismatch is quantified by either a bounded moment condition or a sub-exponential tail condition on the target-to-source density ratio. Our method combines truncated importance-weighting kernel ridge regression with a multiplier bootstrap to construct confidence sets for the regression function. The truncation stabilizes the importance- weighting kernel ridge regression as well as the bootstrap calibration, making our approach applicable even when the density ratio has heavy tails. We prove nonasymptotic validity and sharpness of the resulting confidence sets under suitable operator compatibility conditions, and establish explicit error rates for coverage probability under specific conditions on the target- to-source density ratio and on the spectral decay of the kernel integral operator. Numerical experiments corroborate our theoretical findings.
