Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the traditional approach to AI alignment, arguing that it must evolve to accommodate multiple, legitimate social perspectives rather than relying on a singular set of values. By leveraging social theory, the authors propose a framework for pluralistic alignment that emphasizes the structured coordination of diverse viewpoints and the role of social interactions in shaping these perspectives. The key result is a design space for AI systems that incorporates role-based representations and context-sensitive evaluations, enabling more accountable engagement with varied social contexts.
Pluralistic alignment redefines AI coordination as a socially grounded challenge, not just a matter of output diversity.
As AI systems are deployed across increasingly diverse social contexts, alignment can no longer be framed as the optimization of a single, unified set of values. Instead, systems must be able to recognize, represent, and respond to multiple legitimate perspectives. This has led to growing interest in pluralistic alignment, which seeks to move beyond one-size-fits-all models of appropriate behaviour. However, current approaches often lack a clear account of how values are socially organized, contested, and coordinated in practice. In this paper, we argue that social theory provides essential conceptual and design resources for addressing these challenges. Drawing on established traditions in sociology, we show how perspectives can be understood as structured by roles, shaped through interaction, and distributed across fields of power and expertise. We translate these insights into concrete implications for AI system design, including role-based representations, structured coordination among perspectives, and context-sensitive evaluation. For agentic systems, this requires aligning not only final outputs, but also the role activations, deliberative traces, aggregation rules, and feedback loops through which those outputs are produced. Our contribution is to reposition pluralistic alignment as a problem of socially grounded coordination rather than output diversification. We outline a design space for systems that engage multiple perspectives in structured and accountable ways, and we identify directions for future work to implement and empirically evaluate these approaches in real-world settings.
