Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CRS-Triage, a novel approach for emergency triage that incorporates confidence and reliability assessments to predict patient acuity levels from incomplete electronic health record (EHR) data. By evaluating the reliability of both structured data and clinical text, CRS-Triage selectively decides whether to make a prediction or defer it based on a confidence score, while also addressing the risk of under-triage by favoring higher acuity assignments. Experiments on the MIMIC-IV-ED dataset demonstrate that CRS-Triage not only outperforms traditional models in predictive accuracy but also offers improved risk-coverage trade-offs under challenging data conditions.
CRS-Triage achieves superior predictive performance in emergency triage by effectively managing incomplete and inconsistent EHR data while minimizing the risk of under-triage.
Emergency triage requires reliable decisions within a short time period. However, the available electronic health record (EHR) data, including structured data and clinical text, are often incomplete, unreliable, and inconsistent. This makes machine learning (ML)-based triage prediction more challenging, as existing ML models typically rely on complete and reliable EHR data to accurately predict patients' acuity levels. To address this, we propose confidence- and reliability-aware selective triage (CRS-Triage) to predict patients' acuity levels with a confidence score. By comparing the confidence score with a predefined threshold, CRS-Triage can selectively determine whether the model should make the decision or defer the case. Specifically, CRS-Triage separately evaluates the reliability of structured data and clinical text and then jointly considers the consistency between the two modalities to estimate the confidence of each prediction. Moreover, to reduce the risk of missing high-acuity patients, namely under-triage, CRS-Triage prefers to assign patients slightly higher acuity levels, namely over-triage, by penalizing under-triage errors. Experiments on the MIMIC-IV-ED dataset show that CRS-Triage achieves strong predictive performance. It also provides a better risk-coverage trade-off and remains reliable when the available EHR data are incomplete, degraded, or inconsistent across modalities.