Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the integration of hybrid digital-analogue and neuromorphic computing architectures within existing digital infrastructures to enhance energy efficiency in AI systems. By addressing the limitations of traditional digital computing, it highlights how these hybrid approaches can reduce data movement and accelerate processing for matrix-intensive and event-driven tasks. The authors advocate for a system-level evaluation of AI performance, emphasizing the importance of practical deployment metrics over peak performance claims.
Hybrid digital-analogue computing could redefine energy efficiency in AI by leveraging physical substrates where they provide real system-level advantages.
The digital revolution, which progressively replaced analogue methods with digital circuits, has entered a new phase as AI expands across cloud infrastructure, mobile networks, wearables and physical systems, including drones and robots. Digital computing remains the general-purpose foundation of this expansion: it supports heterogeneous, on-device and decentralised AI through programmable control, mature software and decades of accumulated engineering infrastructure. Yet as energy and data-movement constraints become more significant, that same foundation is increasingly being extended rather than replaced by selected analogue and physical principles that it can host, configure and verify. Photonic, in-memory and neuromorphic architectures offer routes to reducing data movement and accelerating matrix-intensive and event-driven processing, not as alternatives to digital infrastructure but as specialised engines operating within it. This paper argues that hybrid digital--analogue computing represents a credible pathway towards more energy-efficient AI systems: one in which physical substrates earn an expanding role only where they deliver a measurable system-level advantage, under digital orchestration that manages integration, uncertainty and fallback. It examines the architectural principles, workload suitability, energy accounting, software requirements, limitations and open challenges associated with this transition, and argues that future progress should be evaluated through deployed-system metrics rather than isolated peak tera operations per second per watt (TOPS/W) claims.
