Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts a comprehensive survey of cognitive capability gaps in generative and agentic AI, focusing on five key dimensions: persistent state modeling, goal-directed autonomy, self-monitoring and control, environment interaction, and learning and adaptation. By identifying limitations and open challenges within these areas, the authors propose a conceptual Adaptive Cognitive Intelligence Architecture (ACIA) that aims to enhance long-term reasoning and adaptive decision-making in AI systems. The taxonomy and architectural framework serve as a roadmap for future research, ultimately contributing to the advancement of more reliable and cognitively capable AI systems, with implications for achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
Cognitive AI is hindered by significant capability gaps that could stall progress toward truly intelligent systems, but a new taxonomy reveals pathways for overcoming these limitations.
Cognitive AI seeks to move beyond language generation and autonomous task execution toward systems capable of sustained reasoning, adaptive behavior, persistent memory, and self-regulation. While generative and agentic AI have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks, many fundamental cognitive functions remain fragmented or weakly developed, limiting reliable operation over extended time horizons. This paper presents a taxonomy-driven survey of the major cognitive capability gaps that continue to constrain the development of Cognitive AI. The literature is organized around five dimensions: persistent state modeling, goal-directed autonomy, self-monitoring and control, environment interaction, and learning and adaptation. For each dimension, we review recent advances, identify recurring limitations, and discuss open research challenges. Building on these insights, we outline a conceptual Adaptive Cognitive Intelligence Architecture (ACIA) and examine emerging directions in cognition-centric evaluation. The proposed taxonomy provides a unified framework for organizing existing research, identifying unresolved challenges, and guiding the design of future cognitively capable systems. Together, the taxonomy, architectural perspective, and evaluation framework offer a roadmap for advancing AI systems that exhibit more reliable long-term reasoning, adaptive decision-making, and continual learning. The survey highlights key research opportunities toward more adaptive, reliable, and cognitively capable AI systems, providing a foundation for future progress toward Cognitive AI and, ultimately, Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).