Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores caregiver perceptions of care robots across four categories鈥攕upply delivery, patient assistance, vital sign monitoring, and mobility support鈥攖hrough a mixed-methods approach involving 298 participants from the U.S., Mexico, and Chile. Results show that caregivers generally favor robots for logistical tasks but express reservations about their use in roles requiring emotional engagement, highlighting a nuanced understanding of ethical implications. The research underscores the importance of context in shaping attitudes towards care robots, revealing both optimism for their benefits and concerns about reliability and job displacement.
Caregivers are optimistic about care robots for logistical tasks but wary of their role in emotionally sensitive interactions, revealing a complex landscape of acceptance and ethical concerns.
Care robots are increasingly being introduced into healthcare settings, raising important questions about their acceptance and ethical implementation. To better understand these challenges, this study investigates caregivers'perceptions of four categories of care robots: delivering supplies, helping patients into bed, monitoring vital signs, and assisting with mobility. We conducted a mixed-methods study employing a mixed-factorial design in which 298 caregivers from the United States, Mexico, and Chile evaluated all four robot categories. Quantitative measures integrated constructs from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, the Cognitive-Affective-Normative model, and overall acceptance ratings. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions and analyzed using a literature-informed ethical framework. The results indicate that participants across countries generally evaluated care robots positively, particularly for logistical and physically demanding tasks rather than those requiring intensive interpersonal interaction. The qualitative findings provide further insight into stakeholders'views of the ethical implications of care robot use. Participants emphasized potential benefits such as reduced workload, lower risk, and greater patient autonomy, while also expressing concerns about dependability, the need for human oversight, and potential job displacement. Although many ethical concerns were shared across countries, participants differed in how they interpreted and prioritized them. These findings advance a context-sensitive and socially informed understanding of responsible design and implementation of care robots.
