Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces a behavioral measurement framework that quantifies the intent and decision-making authority consumers assign to AI in financial contexts. Analyzing 1.5 million interactions with ChatGPT and Gemini from over 6,000 users in the U.S. and India, the findings reveal that while consumers frequently use AI for information retrieval and shaping financial judgments, they rarely delegate execution authority to these systems. This research establishes a baseline for understanding the evolving dynamics of human-AI collaboration in financial decision-making.
Consumers are leveraging AI for financial insights but are hesitant to delegate execution, highlighting a critical gap in human-AI collaboration.
As AI increasingly participates in human decision making, understanding how decision-making authority is distributed between humans and AI has become a fundamental behavioural question. We introduce a behavioural measurement framework combining intent and delegated decision authority to quantify what consumers seek from AI and how much decision-making authority they assign to it. Applied to 1.5 million real-world ChatGPT and Gemini interactions from 6,304 users in the United States and India, we find that financial services are already a substantial AI use case. Consumers overwhelmingly use AI to retrieve information and shape financial judgement, while delegation of financial execution remains rare. By shifting attention from conversation topics to delegated decision authority, this work establishes a behavioural baseline for measuring the transition to increasingly agentic AI.
