Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the critical issue of DRAM read disturbance, specifically focusing on the RowHammer and RowPress phenomena, which can lead to unintended bitflips during DRAM access. By identifying inconsistencies between existing device-level models and empirical observations, the authors conduct a series of TCAD simulations that align with experimental results, thereby refining our understanding of the mechanisms behind these disturbances. The findings not only update the error mechanisms associated with RowHammer and RowPress but also highlight key parameters that influence the accuracy of simulations, paving the way for improved mitigation strategies.
Bridging the gap between experimental data and device-level modeling reveals critical insights into the mechanisms behind DRAM read disturbances that could redefine mitigation approaches.
DRAM read disturbance, like RowHammer and RowPress, is a critical robustness issue where accessing DRAM can cause unintended bitflips in other unaccessed DRAM locations. DRAM read disturbance bitflips significantly impact the safe, secure, and reliable operation of DRAM-based computing systems. Many prior works experimentally characterize these bitflips and propose mitigations based on empirical results. Other device-level works study their underlying physical mechanisms, but these mechanisms do not fully explain all major empirical observations. Our goal is to bridge the gap between experimental characterization and device-level modeling and understanding of RowHammer and RowPress, providing a principled foundation for future work on understanding, characterizing, and mitigating DRAM read disturbance. We first identify and demonstrate gaps and inconsistencies between the physical mechanisms of RowHammer and RowPress described by existing device-level models and experimental characterization of their bitflips. We focus on three fundamental metrics that should map to first-order physical mechanisms: 1) bitflip directions, 2) bitflip counts, and 3) the minimum number of aggressor row activations that trigger the first bitflips (i.e., ACmin). Second, we present a comprehensive and rigorous set of TCAD simulations that match phenomena observed in experimental characterizations of RowHammer and RowPress bitflips. From our results, we 1) summarize updated device-level error mechanisms for understanding RowHammer and RowPress bitflips, and 2) identify key modeling and simulation parameters that significantly affect whether simulation results match real-chip characterization. We discuss implications for 1) rigorous, comprehensive, and efficient experimental characterization methodologies of DRAM read disturbance bitflips, and 2) the design of DRAM read disturbance mitigation techniques.
