Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces DivAlign, a four-stage pipeline designed to enhance personalized research ideation by addressing the limitations of existing AI systems that generate isolated recommendations. By extracting detailed researcher profiles and scoring candidate research directions based on Executability, Comprehensibility, and Growth Potential, DivAlign effectively diversifies the research portfolio of a community while ensuring alignment with individual researchers' needs. The method significantly reduces redundancy in research themes, achieving a notable decrease in average pairwise similarity from 0.331 to 0.294, while maintaining a high fit score for researcher-specific directions.
DivAlign reduces community-level redundancy in research ideation by tailoring suggestions to individual researcher profiles, achieving a 12% drop in similarity scores without sacrificing relevance.
AI-assisted research ideation has emerged as a promising paradigm for accelerating scientific discovery, with systems now capable of generating research directions conditioned on papers, topics, or lightweight researcher contexts. Yet current systems largely optimize individual suggestions in isolation. This leaves two blind spots. First, coarse researcher representations may elicit mainstream directions that appear broadly feasible, but lack sufficient researcher-specific grounding. Second, independent recommendations can concentrate a community's portfolio around recurring high-probability themes. To address these blind spots, we propose DivAlign, a four-stage pipeline for alignment-preserving de-homogenization. DivAlign extracts fine-grained researcher profiles, generates profile-conditioned candidate directions, scores them along three alignment dimensions (Executability, Comprehensibility, and Growth Potential), and surfaces researcher-local directions while reducing redundancy across the community portfolio. On a benchmark we construct from 95 AI researchers across five subfields, DivAlign reduces community-level redundancy while preserving researcher-direction fit. Compared with coarse single-shot ideation, it lowers average pairwise similarity from 0.331 to 0.294 and nearest-neighbor similarity from 0.704 to 0.608. Compared with the independent top-choice variant, DivAlign reduces nearest-neighbor similarity from 0.663 to 0.608 while retaining 99.9% of the researcher-direction fit score. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Ruixxxx/DivAlign.
