Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the activity patterns of human cortical organoids under stimulus-evoked conditions using a novel graph-computational framework. By analyzing longitudinal high-density microelectrode array recordings, the authors found that repeated stimulation leads to a significant depression and spatial contraction of the evoked response, challenging the applicability of traditional propagation metrics in this context. The results highlight that while organoids exhibit synchronized network bursts, their connectivity dynamics are altered by prior stimulation, necessitating a reevaluation of how we interpret neural circuit development in organoid models.
Repeated stimulation in human cortical organoids can reduce network engagement from 93% to just 10%, revealing critical insights about neural circuit maturation and response dynamics.
Human cortical organoids provide an experimentally accessible model of early neural circuit formation, yet whether their activity reflects structured information processing rather than spontaneous synchronization is unclear. We developed a graph-computational framework to quantify stimulus-evoked propagation. This includes stimulus-conditioned functional graphs, a graph-constrained dynamical (graph-neural-network) model used as a system-identification tool, a biological message-passing principle bounding integration depth by observable propagation depth, and a suite of graph-level metrics. We carried this program out in full on longitudinal HD-MEA recordings from three organoids. Once the true acquisition sampling rate and stimulus timing were recovered, the evoked response proved to be a fast, near-synchronous network burst with no measurable outward propagation (peak-latency vs. distance slope = 0). The propagation/integration-depth metrics (Deff ,reachability index, dmax) therefore do not apply, and per-day connectivity graphs were not reliably estimable at the available trial count, a negative result with methodological consequences for applying such metrics to organoid data. Reframing around synchrony, response-population size and shared variability revealed a control-validated phenomenon, i.e., repeated daily stimulation progressively depressed and spatially contracted the evoked response. That repeated stimulation reshapes organoid networks is established, but longitudinal designs in which every preparation is stimulated cannot separate this from developmental maturation. We break that confound with a developmentally-matched, stimulation-naive control, where at day 7, an organoid receiving its first-ever stimulation engaged 93% of the array, whereas organoids with five prior sessions engaged 10%.
