Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study systematically evaluates machine learning classifiers, specifically XGBoost, AdaBoost, and Neural Networks, for event-by-event background rejection in LAFOV PET scanners, addressing the challenge of increased background rates from accidental coincidences and scattered photons. By framing coincidence classification as a supervised multi-class problem, the authors compare two feature sets and find that a compact 4-feature model generalizes better across different phantom geometries, achieving accuracies of 0.74 and 0.69 for NEMA IEC and XCAT phantoms, respectively. However, the limited suppression of in-phantom scattered coincidences indicates that further improvements in image quality will necessitate more complex input representations or targeted strategies for scattered components.
A compact 4-feature model outperforms traditional methods in background rejection for LAFOV PET scanners, but struggles with scattered coincidences, highlighting the need for more sophisticated approaches.
The introduction of LAFOV PET scanners brings significant sensitivity gains but also a substantial increase in the background rate from accidental coincidences, phantom-scattered and detector-scattered photons. While machine learning methods have been applied to background reduction in PET imaging, they target specific background components in post-processing rather than event-by-event classification on the raw data. In this work, we formulate coincidence classification as a supervised multi-class problem and evaluate XGBoost, AdaBoost and Neural Network classifiers as pre-reconstruction filters, using Monte Carlo simulations of the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra scanner with NEMA IEC and anthropomorphic XCAT phantoms. We investigate two feature sets: a 4-feature representation based on the Attenuation Factor, photon time difference, energy sum, and energy difference, and an extended 6-feature set that incorporates topology-based variables. A systematic robustness study via cross-phantom inference reveals that the 4-feature models generalise significantly better across different phantom geometries, with XGBoost suffering an accuracy loss of only 0.04 compared to 0.13 for the 6-feature variant. Our best models achieve accuracies of up to 0.74 and 0.69 for the NEMA IEC and XCAT phantoms, respectively, outperforming traditional geometry-based cuts. However, we show that this compact feature set not only provides limited suppression of in-phantom scattered coincidences, but it also can lead to non-trivial spatial patterns. With scattered coincidences being the dominant background component in clinical conditions, this suggests that while the method serves as an effective and geometry-agnostic replacement for traditional cut-based selection, meaningful further gains in image quality will require either larger input representations or dedicated treatment of the phantom-scattered component.
