Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores the perceptions and experiences of early-career software engineering researchers regarding science communication through semi-structured interviews with 18 PhD students. The research identifies a significant gap between the participants' strong motivations to engage in science communication鈥攕uch as collaboration and professional recognition鈥攁nd the barriers they face, including social anxiety and a lack of institutional support. The findings emphasize the necessity for tailored support systems to enhance the effectiveness and confidence of these researchers in their communication efforts.
Early-career software engineers are eager to communicate their research but are often stymied by social anxiety and institutional barriers.
Science communication is increasingly becoming a part of modern research careers, involving researchers to disseminate knowledge, engage broader communities, and increase the societal impact of their work. Despite its growing importance, little is known about how early-career software engineering researchers perceive and navigate science communication in practice. In this paper, we investigate how PhD students in software engineering experience science communication. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 doctoral candidates from diverse international backgrounds. Using thematic analysis, we examine three interconnected dimensions: motivations, communication channels, and barriers. Our findings reveal a strong tension between aspiration and practice. Participants were highly motivated to engage in science communication due to opportunities for collaboration, professional recognition, broader impact, and advocacy for themselves and their research. However, translating these motivations into action was frequently constrained by social anxiety, uncertainty regarding appropriate audiences and communication venues, limited feedback mechanisms, insufficient institutional guidance, and challenges associated with navigating an increasingly fragmented communication landscape. Our findings highlight the need for tailored, balanced support systems that empower software engineering PhD students to engage in science communication effectively and confidently across diverse cultural and institutional environments. We outline practical implications that offer initial guidance for addressing these challenges in future work.
