Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study systematically evaluates the robustness of automated age estimation systems against simple appearance manipulations, such as facial hair and makeup, that underage individuals might use to circumvent age verification. The analysis of seven models, including vision and multimodal large language models, reveals that up to 61% of True Negatives can be misclassified as False Positives under specific manipulations, with notable demographic disparities in vulnerability. Additionally, the research explores bias mitigation strategies that can be applied in lightweight settings to enhance model resilience against these manipulations.
Up to 61% of age verification systems can be fooled by simple facial manipulations, revealing critical vulnerabilities in automated age estimation.
Online platforms increasingly rely on automated age estimation systems to enforce minimum-age policies. Focusing on vision-based models designed for this task, concerns arise regarding their robustness to simple appearance changes that underage individuals may use to bypass such systems, such as drawing a mustache or applying lipstick. In this work, we present a systematic study of age verification robustness by simulating visual alterations that can be easily achieved by underage individuals. We evaluate seven models, including vision, vision-language, and multimodal large language models, across three datasets and four manipulation types. Interestingly, under drawn beard stubble, up to 61% of True Negatives are flipped into False Positives. Furthermore, we investigate how different demographics are affected by such manipulations, finding that Indians are more affected by beard stubble manipulations, while females are more affected than males across all manipulations. Finally, we explore how these biases can be mitigated using bias mitigation methodologies in lightweight linear probe settings.
