Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces HydroAgent, a skill-orchestrated framework that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) into flood forecasting workflows by formalizing tacit forecaster expertise through explicit rules and review checkpoints. The approach was validated in the South Yamhill River basin, achieving a remarkable accuracy in predicting peak flow and flood volume, with results showing a Pearson correlation of up to 0.84 across multiple events. HydroAgent enhances traditional forecasting methods by translating expert judgment into a structured, auditable process, thereby improving decision-making without replacing human forecasters.
HydroAgent achieves up to 84% correlation in flood predictions by embedding expert rules into LLM-driven workflows, transforming tacit knowledge into structured decision-making.
Operational flood forecasting depends on tacit forecaster expertise that is difficult to formalize, audit, and transfer. Although artificial intelligence methods have advanced flood prediction and model-error correction, most existing studies have not explicitly represented the tacit expert rules, review checkpoints, and workflow constraints that connect model outputs to operational warning decisions. To address this issue, we propose HydroAgent, a skill-orchestrated agent framework that embeds Large Language Models (LLMs) into a model-driven flood forecasting workflow, where each skill encodes explicit rules to bound LLM reasoning. We validated its effectiveness using five state-of-the-art LLMs in the South Yamhill River basin. Our results demonstrate that prior judgment captures observed peak flow and flood volume within 5% tolerance in 10 and 11 out of 14 events, with 5-fold cross-validation over 129 events yielding Pearson correlations of 0.62 and 0.84. Building on a high-baseline scheme library (average KGE 0.890), the guided scheme selection further improves KGE by 0.023-0.154, with simulated peak flow and flood volume falling within the prior judgment ranges for 14 and 13 out of 14 events. All five tested LLMs successfully execute the HydroAgent workflow with comparable judgment accuracy (40%-80%), while showing moderate performance variation and substantial cost differences. HydroAgent does not aim to replace human forecasters; instead, it translates their tacit expertise into an auditable and reproducible workflow, streamlining analytical steps and supporting more informed decision-making. This skill-orchestrated paradigm demonstrates how explicit rule boundaries can guide language model reasoning to complement physically based simulation in next-generation flood forecasting.
