Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the alignment between acoustic biomarkers used for diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and human perceptual responses across different languages and genders. By training models on Mandarin and Greek speakers, the authors reveal significant discrepancies in how well these biomarkers predict clinical AD status and human perception, particularly noting that the alignment is strong for Mandarin and female speakers but fails for Greek and male speakers. The findings underscore the necessity for population-specific auditing in AI systems to ensure equitable and effective clinical applications.
Pathological markers for Alzheimer's may mislead diagnostic AI, particularly for Greek and male speakers, revealing critical demographic gaps in acoustic biomarker effectiveness.
Acoustic biomarkers show promise for detecting Alzheimer's Disease (AD), yet whether the cues driving diagnostic AI align with those salient to human listeners is underexplored across languages and genders, where pathological markers and perceptual strategies differ. We train models to predict clinical AD status (pathology) and human perceptual scores across Mandarin and Greek, male and female speakers. Using SHAP for interpretability and statistical models for validation, we compare feature importance by subgroup. Results reveal a context-dependent divergence: pathological-perceptual alignment is significant for Mandarin and female speakers but disappears for Greek and male speakers, where pathology models did not exceed chance; this is a failure mode that population-specific auditing surfaces. Global Explainable AI (XAI) explanations can mask critical demographic divergences, highlighting the need for population-specific explainability auditing for equitable deployment of clinical speech AI.
