Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study applied a consensus anomaly detection framework to analyze monthly malaria surveillance data from Ghana between 2014 and 2023, revealing structured anomalies in transmission patterns. The findings highlighted a spatial distinction between anomaly burden and frequency, with Tamale exhibiting the highest burden during anomalies, while Ashanti districts showed the highest rates of anomalous transmission. This differentiation underscores that areas with high malaria cases are not necessarily those experiencing the most unusual transmission behaviors, emphasizing the need for refined surveillance strategies.
Anomalous malaria transmission patterns reveal that high-burden regions like Tamale may not be the most frequent hotspots, challenging traditional surveillance approaches.
A consensus anomaly detection framework was applied to monthly malaria surveillance data from Ghana (2014-2023) to identify atypical transmission patterns. Anomalies were highly structured in space and time. Ashanti and Northern Regions accounted for most recurrent anomalies, with persistent hotspots at Tamale, Kumasi, and Accra. A key finding was the spatial distinction between anomaly burden (cumulative cases during anomalous periods) and anomaly frequency (persistence of unusual behaviour). Tamale had the highest burden during anomalies, whereas the highest anomaly rates clustered in Ashanti districts, showing that high-burden areas are not necessarily those with the most frequent anomalous transmission. Anomalous months formed a statistically distinct group, with much higher case counts (Cohen's $d = 3.252$) and large seasonal deviations ($d > 1.2$) compared with normal months. Malaria burden alone provides an incomplete picture of transmission dynamics. By distinguishing where malaria is most prevalent from where transmission behaves most unusually, this framework can strengthen surveillance, prioritise investigations, and support targeted control strategies.
