Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the reliability challenges posed by the democratization of AI agent creation within organizations, where non-engineering users develop agents that may silently degrade over time due to dependencies on various external factors. To tackle this issue, the authors propose a lightweight continuous-assurance framework that incorporates dependency mapping, readiness contracts, scheduled checks, diagnostics, and lifecycle governance to ensure operational readiness. An initial prototype auditor and scenario-based assessments demonstrate the framework's practical applicability and provide actionable remediation guidance for maintaining agent reliability.
Silent degradation of AI agents can be mitigated with a continuous-assurance framework that keeps citizen-created tools operationally ready.
AI agents are increasingly created inside organizations by non-engineering users through low-code, no-code, and conversational development environments. This democratization enables rapid local innovation, but it also creates a reliability gap: agents that appear to users as simple productivity artifacts may depend on changing models, tools, retrieval sources, permissions, prompts, schedules, and external services. These dependencies can cause silent degradation long after deployment, even when no user directly modifies the agent. This paper identifies the reliability challenge created by democratized AI agent creation and proposes a lightweight continuous-assurance framework for citizen-created organizational agents. The framework combines dependency mapping, readiness contracts, scheduled checks, diagnostics, and lifecycle governance to assess whether an agent remains operationally ready under expected conditions. We also present an initial prototype auditor and scenario-based assessment showing how the proposed taxonomy can be translated into practical checks and actionable remediation guidance.
