Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the regulatory challenges posed by autonomous and agentic AI, highlighting that traditional regulatory assumptions about knowledge and control are increasingly inadequate as these attributes shift within the AI supply chain. By analyzing four distinct regulatory systems鈥擴K content platform regulation, data protection, UK financial services, and the EU AI Act鈥攊t identifies the limitations of existing governance models and the need for innovative approaches. The proposed solutions aim to transition regulation from a reactive to an active process, addressing the systemic risks introduced by AI autonomy.
Traditional regulatory frameworks are failing to keep pace with the shifting landscape of AI autonomy, necessitating a radical rethink of governance strategies.
Regulating activities where regulatees use autonomous and agentic AI is challenging. Regulatory assumptions about regulatee knowledge and control no longer hold true; much of that lies elsewhere in the AI supply chain which thus needs to be brought within the scope of regulation. Governance systems for autonomous AI cannot replicate existing governance models, but need a fresh approach. Retrospective supervisory oversight becomes ineffective as a risk management tool, and AI autonomy generates new systemic risks which require new solutions. This paper investigate four regulatory systems: UK regulation of content platforms, data protection, UK financial services, and the EU AI Act\'92s cross-sectoral regime. It analyses the challenges posed by autonomous and agentic AI and proposes potential solutions which regulators might adopt. These will transform regulation from a reactive process to an active one, and assist it in adapting to the challenges of AI autonomy.
