Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for assessing the carbon and water footprints of high-performance computing (HPC) jobs, integrating both operational and embodied impacts. The findings reveal that while increasing thread counts typically lowers the total environmental footprint, the advantages plateau at higher counts, indicating diminishing returns. Notably, the study distinguishes that water usage is primarily influenced by embodied impacts, whereas carbon emissions are predominantly driven by operational factors.
Higher thread counts in HPC jobs reduce environmental footprints, but the gains taper off, highlighting a critical trade-off in sustainability assessments.
High performance computing evaluation has traditionally focused on performance and energy, but these metrics alone cannot capture the sustainability cost of runtime configurations. We proposes a unified job-level water and carbon accounting framework with both operational and embodied impacts. Results show that higher thread counts generally reduce total footprint, but the benefit diminishes at higher thread counts. Water is mainly dominated by embodied impact, whereas carbon is mainly dominated by operational impact.
