Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This survey investigates the complexities of multimodal humor in AI, particularly focusing on visual humor in memes, cartoons, and comics, where understanding relies on cultural context and communicative intent rather than mere scene description. It categorizes existing literature into a capability-centric hierarchy that encompasses recognition, interpretation, reasoning, and generation, while also synthesizing benchmarks and evaluation protocols. The authors identify critical challenges in the field, including evaluation biases, cultural limitations, and unresolved safety issues, emphasizing the need for robust models that can navigate these intricacies.
Humor in AI remains a frontier, with multimodal models struggling against cultural nuances and evaluative shortcuts that hinder progress.
Multimodal humor in memes, cartoons, and comics remains difficult for AI systems because intended meaning depends on non-literal mechanisms, shared cultural knowledge, and communicative intent rather than literal scene description. This survey focuses on visual humor understanding in single-image and multi-panel artifacts, while treating humor generation as an emerging downstream frontier. We position the literature against prior humor, sarcasm, and general MLLM surveys and organize it using a capability-centric hierarchy spanning recognition, interpretation and reasoning, and generation. Under this lens, we synthesize benchmark design, evaluation protocols, and modeling paradigms, tracing the field's shift from task-specific fusion models to large-model approaches based on multimodal alignment, evidence-grounded reasoning, and controlled generation. We conclude by highlighting the main barriers to progress: shortcut-prone evaluation, limited cultural and narrative coverage, weak evidence grounding, and unresolved safety and ownership concerns.
