Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study critiques the current methodology for measuring crowd noise in stadiums, which relies on a single peak dB(A) reading that lacks standardization and comprehensive data. By proposing a framework that emphasizes spatially distributed acoustic measurements, the authors aim to enable more accurate and scientifically valid comparisons across different venues. The key finding is that a single-anchor measurement is insufficient for meaningful assessments, highlighting the need for a more robust approach to quantify crowd noise effectively.
Current records of stadium crowd noise are misleadingly based on single-point measurements, but a new framework reveals the need for spatially distributed assessments to ensure accuracy.
Public claims about the loudest stadium have been based on an instantaneous peak dB(A) reading measured at a single point, as popularised by the Guinness World Records"loudest crowd roar"category. The current record dates from 2014, where a maximum level of 142.2 dB(A) was registered. While compelling, those measurements lack standardisation, omitting relevant information such as the specific instrument that was used, the usage of time weighting, and the number of measurement positions that were tested. This lack of information does not allow a well-founded scientific comparison across sport venues. This study proposes a measurement framework in which spatially distributed acoustic measurement is the recommended route for a representative cross-venue comparison, while a single-anchor measurement can only serve as a minimum reporting baseline when distributed measurements are not feasible.
