Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study systematically analyzes the robustness of Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) on IBM Heron hardware, focusing on factors such as shot budgets, qubit layouts, and noise mitigation strategies. The findings reveal that while SQD demonstrates resilience to structured perturbations in CCSD amplitudes, the effectiveness of different hardware configurations varies significantly during initial recovery iterations but stabilizes over time. Notably, accuracy reaches a plateau at moderate shot budgets, suggesting diminishing returns with excessive sampling, which highlights both the strengths and limitations of SQD in practical applications.
SQD's robustness is challenged by hardware choices, revealing that initial layout and noise strategies can drastically impact performance before stabilizing.
Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) is a hybrid quantum-classical method that replaces variational optimization with a self-consistent recovery loop over QPU samples. Although SQD is considered robust to noisy samples and imperfect classical inputs, its robustness across practical deployment choices has not been systematically analyzed. As a result, shot budgets, qubit layouts, noise mitigation strategies, and the coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) amplitudes that initialize the ansatz are often chosen without clear empirical guidance. We analyze SQD robustness on IBM Heron hardware across these dimensions. Structured CCSD-amplitude perturbations, including complete zeroing, produce only modest energy shifts from the clean baseline. Differences across layouts and noise-mitigation settings are large in the first recovery iteration but narrow within a few iterations. Accuracy saturates at moderate shot budgets, while very large budgets slightly worsen recovered energies, likely because working-set selection limits the value of additional samples. These results identify where SQD provides genuine deployment robustness and where its limits remain.
