Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the "Thinking in Video" paradigm, which redefines video generation as a medium for causal reasoning rather than just an output artifact. By employing the Causal-Generative Dual-Judge (CGDJ) framework, the authors assess the ability of video generators to engage in causal reasoning through explicit and implicit evaluations. The findings reveal a significant Perception-Prediction Gap, indicating that while open-source models generate plausible dynamics, they lack explicit causal perception, and even advanced closed-source models struggle with aligning reasoning and generation.
Video generators may convincingly simulate real-world dynamics, but they often fail to understand the underlying causal relationships, revealing a critical gap in their reasoning capabilities.
Recent advances in world models and video generation have given rise to an emerging reasoning paradigm that leverages video generative models to simulate, predict, and reason about real-world dynamics. We redefine this paradigm as Thinking in Video, where video is not merely an output artifact but a medium for constructing, extending, and verifying causal thought. However, this promise remains unverified: convincing rollouts may reflect memorized appearances rather than causal understanding, while existing metrics separate perceptual fidelity from semantic logic. To evaluate whether video generators support such reasoning, we introduce the Causal-Generative Dual-Judge (CGDJ), auditing World Model Consistency from two perspectives. Explicit Causal Perception tests whether a generator reads a video scenario as a reasoning problem through spatio-temporal flattened visual question answering, while Implicit Generative Perception-Prediction Gap evaluates whether it renders the causal consequence as a consistent future video. Applying CGDJ to representative open- and closed-source generators reveals a clear Perception-Prediction Gap: open-source models produce plausible dynamics despite near-zero explicit causal perception, whereas advanced closed-source systems show stronger but still limited alignment between reasoning and generation. Further analysis exposes audio-visual misalignment, where models verbalize correct causal logic more reliably than they render it, challenging the "world simulator" narrative.
