Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a diagnostic framework for understanding AI agent behavior through a two-layer approach: the foundational computational layer and the behavioral modulation layer. By distinguishing between the capabilities defined by an agent's architecture and the contextual factors that influence behavior, the framework allows for a nuanced evaluation of AI actions in various systems. The authors highlight that effective governance and intervention in AI behavior necessitate a clear understanding of the source of that behavior, which can lead to improved validation and accountability measures.
Understanding AI behavior requires dissecting its origins, revealing that governance must be informed by the underlying layers of agent design and context.
AI agents increasingly act within the same clinical, political, scientific, and social systems that behavioral scientists study. Evaluating these systems requires source-level diagnosis: the same behavioral pattern may arise from an agent representational substrate or from the roles, objectives, interaction structures, and governance rules that shape its expression. This Perspective proposes a diagnostic framework for AI agent behavior: layer attribution. The foundational computational layer defines what behaviors are possible through architecture, memory, perception, attention, and representation. The behavioral modulation layer shapes how those capacities are expressed through identity, resources, objectives, social interaction, institutional constraints, and governance. The framework clarifies three consequences: surrogate validity is a model-task-layer relation, human-AI divergence provides diagnostic evidence, and governance requires source attribution before intervention. Treating AI agents as behavioral actors therefore requires evaluation methods that determine where behavior originates before deciding how to explain, validate, or govern it.
