Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how generative AI (GenAI) is altering the development pathway for junior software engineers by conducting 14 semi-structured interviews with both juniors and senior engineers in South Korea. The findings reveal a foundational pattern of "Absorption," where GenAI reassigns entry-level tasks to senior workflows, leading to significant consequences such as the loss of productive struggle necessary for expertise development and a perceptual gap between juniors and seniors. The research highlights the urgent need for institutional changes in educational and workplace settings to preserve the traditional pathways for skill development in software engineering.
GenAI is not just automating tasks; it鈥檚 fundamentally reshaping the career trajectories of junior software engineers, risking the loss of essential learning experiences.
Generative AI (GenAI) is reshaping software engineering, raising concerns about how the development pathway through which juniors become seniors is being eroded. While macro statistics show a decline in junior hiring and controlled studies demonstrate the effects of AI on individual task performance, the mechanisms through which GenAI reshapes early-career development in real organizational and educational contexts have not been thoroughly examined. Through 14 semi-structured interviews with juniors at the threshold of entering software engineering and senior software engineers in South Korea, analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis, we reveal a foundational pattern of Absorption -- GenAI redirects entry-level work into senior-AI workflows -- and three consequences: (1) juniors losing the productive struggle through which expertise once developed; (2) the structural reproduction of this loss through collective normalization of GenAI use in university classrooms; and (3) the perceptual asymmetry between seniors and juniors that prevents either side from correcting these dynamics on their own. By extending learning theory and situated cognition to organizational and institutional scales, we argue that GenAI appears to be absorbing not just specific categories of tasks but also parts of the pathway through which the next generation of seniors is formed. Preserving this pathway will require deliberate institutional design across classrooms, workplaces, and the evaluation criteria for juniors.
