Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study benchmarks six multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on a standardized scientific visualization literacy assessment, evaluating their performance against data from 485 human participants. The results reveal that while Gemini outperforms the human mean across certain subsets, most models, particularly open-source ones, fall below human baseline performance, with significant variability across different visualization techniques and tasks. Notably, models struggle with fine-grained quantitative estimation and integration-based visualizations, highlighting the necessity of SciVis literacy as a critical evaluation metric for multimodal AI systems.
Current multimodal language models falter in scientific visualization literacy, with only Gemini surpassing human performance in select areas.
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to interpret visualizations, yet current evaluations remain largely chart-centric and provide limited evidence of understanding of scientific visualization (SciVis). We benchmark six MLLMs on the scientific visualization literacy assessment test, a standardized SciVis literacy assessment comprising 49 items based on 18 scientific visualizations and illustrations, spanning 8 techniques and 11 task types. We evaluate three closed-source and three open-source models under a closed-world protocol and compare their performance using data from 485 human participants. Results show that current MLLMs do not exhibit uniform SciVis literacy. Gemini is the strongest model overall, exceeding the human mean across the evaluated subsets, whereas the open-source models remain below the human baseline. Performance is highly uneven across techniques and tasks: models perform best on scientific illustration, search, and spatial understanding, but struggle on texture-based and integration-based visualizations and on quantitative estimation. Error analysis reveals recurring failures in fine-grained quantitative estimation, flow-direction interpretation, and grounded encoding interpretation. These findings position SciVis literacy as a necessary benchmark dimension for evaluating multimodal AI systems. Our code and model outputs are publicly available at https://github.com/patdmp/mllm-scivis-lit-benchmark.
