Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Dynamic Verifiable Multi-Agent Human Agentic Loyalty Loop (DVM-HALL) model, which redefines consumer-brand relationships in the context of autonomous AI agents making purchasing decisions. By integrating emotional equity, machine-experience utility, and execution risks into a softmax probability framework, the model accounts for algorithmic bounded rationality and constructed autonomy, offering a more nuanced understanding of loyalty dynamics. The Net Human-Agent Score (NHAS) is also proposed as a risk-weighted metric to measure human-agent alignment, providing brands with a robust tool to adapt to the evolving landscape of autonomous commerce.
Traditional loyalty models miss the mark in an era where AI agents autonomously influence purchasing decisions, but the DVM-HALL model captures the complexities of this new landscape.
The rapid proliferation of Agentic Artificial Intelligence fundamentally disrupts traditional customer loyalty paradigms. As AI evolves from passive recommendation algorithms to autonomous, goal-directed agents capable of executing purchasing decisions, the conventional understanding of consumer-brand relationships requires a structural reevaluation. By synthesizing extant literature across human-machine teaming, consumer decision-making, and algorithmic trust dynamics, we demonstrate that traditional loyalty models fail to account for algorithmic bounded rationality and constructed autonomy. To address this, we introduce the Dynamic Verifiable Multi-Agent Human Agentic Loyalty Loop (DVM-HALL) model. We formalize brand choice via a softmax probability formulation where human emotional equity, agentic machine-experience utility, calibrated trust, delegated authority, and verifiable execution jointly determine selection. The model features recursive updating mechanisms to dynamically calibrate trust and delegation after each interaction. Crucially, the framework integrates a verifiable execution layer for Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and tokenized loyalty settings, incorporating execution risks -- such as gas costs, slippage, MEV exposure, and smart-contract vulnerabilities -- as core predictors of agentic brand preference. Furthermore, we introduce the Net Human-Agent Score (NHAS), an auditable, risk-weighted metric designed to measure human-agent alignment using human feedback, execution logs, benchmark comparisons, and verifiable receipts. Finally, we propose a comprehensive three-stage empirical validation plan spanning controlled shopping experiments, multi-agent market simulations, and DeFi testbeds. This framework provides the foundational theory required for brands to navigate the impending transition toward machine customers.
