Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores the impact of induced emotions on the decision-making processes of Large Language Models (LLMs) using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and an imagination-based emotion induction technique. While LLMs can recognize and respond to emotions, the research reveals that induced emotions do not broadly influence their decision dynamics as they do in humans; however, anger specifically reduces sensitivity to penalties and limits exploration in early decision-making stages. These findings highlight the nuanced differences in emotional influence between LLMs and humans, offering insights for future research on emotional modulation in AI agents.
Induced anger can lock LLMs into suboptimal choices by reducing their sensitivity to penalties, unlike human decision-making.
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in high-stakes domains, understanding contextual factors that may modulate their decision-making becomes critical. While LLMs are trained to perceive and resonate with users' emotions, it remains unclear whether induced emotion can influence their sequential decision-making. We investigate this question using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a classic psychological paradigm for studying decision-making under uncertainty, combined with an imagination-based emotion induction procedure. We first validate the feasibility of this paradigm by confirming that LLMs can sense strong, distinguishable emotions from context and that LLM agents can learn from sequential interactions in a human-like pace. With the validated setup, we find that, different from humans, induced emotion does not significantly bias the decision dynamics of LLM agents on average. However, the effects of anger are conditioned: inducing anger makes LLM agents less sensitive to penalties for bad decisions, and in early stages of the game, anger can lower exploration, locking decisions into a few choices early. These findings reveal the subtle yet distinct effects of induced emotion on LLM decision-making compared to human behavior, and provide a tool for future research on affective modulation of LLM agents.
NUS