Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces function-aware fill-in-the-middle (FIM) mid-training, a self-supervised approach that enhances coding agents by leveraging the structural similarities between function calls and the action-observation-continuation loop. By applying FIM to Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct and Qwen3-8B on a large decontaminated corpus from GitHub, the authors achieve significant performance improvements across multiple benchmarks, including SWE-Bench and LiveCodeBench. The results indicate that FIM not only enhances in-domain capabilities but also preserves performance in non-agentic contexts, addressing a critical gap in traditional coding agent training methodologies.
Mid-training with function-aware fill-in-the-middle boosts coding agent performance while preventing capability erosion in non-agentic tasks.
Coding agents must integrate external tool returns into ongoing reasoning - a capability that standard left-to-right pretraining on code exposes only in its forward direction. We observe that the action-observation-continuation loop of a coding agent is structurally isomorphic to a function call site, where a caller binds arguments, a callee returns a value computed elsewhere, and downstream code consumes that value. This conditioning structure exists at internet scale in ordinary code. We exploit it through function-aware fill-in-the-middle (FIM) mid-training: a self-supervised objective that masks functions selected via program dependency graph analysis and a complexity-inferability double criterion. We mid-train Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct (7B/14B) and Qwen3-8B on a 2.6B-token decontaminated corpus drawn from 968 GitHub repositories, then apply existing agentic post-training pipelines. Mid-training improves SWE-Bench-Verified by +2.8/+3.0 at 7B/14B and by +3.2 on Qwen3-8B; SWE-Bench-Lite gains are +3.7/+4.0/+5.4 on the same models. The improvement holds across two post-training pipelines (R2E-Gym, SWE-Smith) and on a non-Qwen2.5 base (Qwen3-8B with SWE-Lego). Beyond in-domain gains, mid-training also mitigates the capability erosion that agentic post-training otherwise inflicts on non-agent coding (e.g., LiveCodeBench) and non-coding tool-use benchmarks (tau-bench, BFCL): although the mid-training corpus contains Python code only, the function-call inductive bias survives post-training and yields consistent gains.
