Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques existing benchmarks in AI, arguing that effective tasks must be correct, solvable, verifiable, and relevant to real-world problems as understood by practitioners. It emphasizes the importance of task specification and outcome verification over mere methodological adherence. The authors present a framework for evaluating benchmarks that aligns more closely with practical applications, ultimately enhancing the relevance and utility of AI evaluations.
Benchmarks that resonate with real-world problems can significantly improve AI evaluation and development.
Good tasks are correct, solvable, verifiable, well-specified, and hard for interesting reasons. The best tasks describe a real problem an experienced practitioner would recognize, in language a practitioner would use, with tests that verify the outcome rather than the approach.
