Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces PaperRouter-Agent, a training-free LLM agent designed for personalized hierarchical paper routing (PHPR), which assigns incoming research papers to user-specific folder hierarchies without requiring per-user training. By grounding routing decisions in the content of existing folder members rather than just folder names, the agent significantly improves paper organization efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that PaperRouter-Agent enhances Recall@1 from 0.39 to 0.61 and Recall@3 from 0.57 to 0.83, particularly excelling in organizational folders defined by metadata.
Routing research papers just got smarter鈥擯aperRouter-Agent boosts recall rates by over 50% without any user-specific training.
Researchers organize the papers they collect into personal folder hierarchies in reference managers, and route each new paper into the folder where it belongs. This task differs from standard hierarchical text classification. A user's folder hierarchy is not a fixed, shared taxonomy but a private and evolving folksonomy whose folder meanings may be topical, shorthand, venue-based, or process-oriented, and are often defined by the papers already stored inside them. We formalize this setting as personalized hierarchical paper routing (PHPR): assigning an incoming paper to folders in a user-specific hierarchy without per-user training. We propose PaperRouter-Agent, a training-free LLM agent that grounds routing decisions in folder members rather than folder names alone. The agent first narrows the candidate hierarchy, retrieves folder-specific evidence, verifies fit by inspecting member papers, and incorporates similarity-gated feedback from past user rejections. A formative study on real personal libraries shows that PaperRouter-Agent raises overall Recall@1 from 0.39 to 0.61 and Recall@3 from 0.57 to 0.83, with the largest gains on organizational folders defined by metadata such as venue or year, where single-shot methods collapses (Recall@1 0.09 to 0.50). On the public LaMP-2 benchmark, the same approach improves accuracy from 44.5% to 51.5% (+9.0 macro-F1) over a single-shot baseline, while remaining low-cost for practical use.