Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces PREF-Gate, a framework for relational fraud detection that integrates label-free graph context with label-derived neighborhood evidence while addressing the validity conditions of these information sources. By employing a dual-expert system, the framework utilizes attributes and neighborhood risk selectively based on provenance constraints, leading to improved decision-making in fraud detection. The results show that PREF-Gate achieves high AUPRC scores across multiple datasets, demonstrating that the utility of label-derived evidence is contingent on validation support, thus enhancing the reliability of fraud detection systems.
Label-derived evidence in fraud detection is only reliable when supported by validation, revealing a critical dependency that can reshape detection strategies.
Relational fraud detection can exploit both label-free graph context and label-derived neighborhood evidence, but these two information sources obey different validity conditions. In particular, neighborhood risk becomes invalid when a queried node's own label, or any validation or test label, enters its construction. We formulate this issue as provenance-constrained relational evidence use and present PREF-Gate, an auditable decision framework with two fixed experts and a finite validation gate. The context expert uses attributes, one-hop means, feature residuals, and degree descriptors without labels. The evidence expert adds self-excluded, training-label-only neighborhood risk and empirical-Bayes summaries that expose support, uncertainty, availability, and shrinkage. Before test inference, the gate selects either expert or one of three pre-specified probability mixtures and fixes the decision threshold. On Amazon, YelpChi, and TFinance, using five identical stratified splits and 14 same-protocol methods, PREF-Gate obtains mean AUPRC values of 0.9085, 0.8104, and 0.8913. It selects the label-free expert on all Amazon and YelpChi splits and an evidence mixture on all TFinance splits. Thus, the main result is conditional rather than universal: label-derived relational evidence is useful only where held-out validation supports it. The framework couples competitive ranking performance with an explicit label-provenance contract, finite selection policy, failure accounting, and review-budget evaluation, providing an auditable knowledge-based decision pipeline for graph fraud detection.
