Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts a comprehensive Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) on Federated Learning (FL) for Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) in vehicular networks, addressing critical gaps in the current literature. By auditing over 60 publications, the authors reveal common pitfalls such as unrealistic data distributions and inadequate adversarial evaluations, which hinder the practical deployment of FL-IDS. The study culminates in a proposed research agenda that emphasizes the need for robust benchmarking standards to ensure effective real-world applications of FL in vehicular security.
Fragmented methodologies in vehicular FL-IDS could jeopardize the security of connected vehicles unless addressed with rigorous benchmarking and realistic evaluations.
Modern vehicular networks face an expanding attack surface across internal Electronic Control Units (ECUs) and external Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication. Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a decentralized paradigm to deploy Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) without compromising data privacy. However, the vehicular FL-IDS literature suffers from fragmented methodologies and unrealistic experimental setups. This paper presents a Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) that unifies the taxonomy of vehicular attack surfaces, evaluates FL topologies, and maps adversarial threats such as poisoning and inference attacks. By auditing over 60 publications, we identify recurring pitfalls: artificial IID data splits, reliance on trivial benchmarks, weak adversarial evaluation, and omission of real-time CAN constraints. Finally, we define a forward-looking research agenda and outline minimum benchmarking requirements necessary to transition vehicular FL-IDS from optimistic simulations to secure, real-world deployment.
