Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the concept of initiation authorization as a critical safety dimension for generalist robots, arguing that robots must assess whether to perform their first hard-to-undo social action, such as greetings or physical interactions. The authors highlight the inadequacy of current safety frameworks that overlook this aspect, often equating high engagement scores with permission to act. Through the implementation of a probe-authorize-speak (PAS) approach on a humanoid robot, they provide a comparative analysis with direct initiation methods, revealing significant implications for user consent and interaction safety.
Robots may be acting without consent, highlighting a crucial gap in safety protocols that could lead to unintended social consequences.
Safety for generalist robots is usually discussed in terms of motion or dialogue. We argue a third question is missing: should the robot take its first hard-to-undo social action at all, such as a greeting, an uninvited grasp, or stepping into someone's space? We call this initiation authorization. Current frameworks rarely treat it as a separate safety layer. Today's stacks often skip this step: a high engagement score or a confident VLA rollout is treated as permission to act. But seeing a person is not the same as having their consent to be addressed. We frame initiation authorization within generalist-robot safety and contrast it with post-plan VLA guardrails, implementing PAS (probe-authorize-speak) on a doorway humanoid, comparing it with direct-init on logged traces, and proposing a three-condition user study, with open questions on metrics, governance, and where initiation ends and foundation-model generation begins.
