Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
NUSAalborgChung-AngCVCHFUTJHUKAUSTLundMBZUAINagoyaNJUNTUPKUSCUTSEUSJTUSouthwest UTsukubaUESTCUNCUSTCXidianJul 8, 2026arXiv:2607.07320The SoccerNet 2026 Challenges advanced sports video understanding through five distinct vision-based tasks, including Ball Action Anticipation and Player-Centric Ball Action Spotting, which required participants to predict and classify ball-related actions in football. With 427 teams submitting 1,129 entries, the challenges provided a comprehensive benchmarking platform that facilitated the evaluation of novel methodologies and the sharing of technical insights. The results highlight significant advancements in the accuracy and efficiency of computer vision techniques applied to sports, showcasing the potential for real-world applications in sports analytics and broadcasting.
Over 1,100 submissions reveal groundbreaking advancements in sports video understanding, with new methods pushing the boundaries of action prediction and localization.
The SoccerNet 2026 Challenges constitute the sixth annual edition of the SoccerNet open benchmarking effort, dedicated to advancing computer vision research in sports video understanding. This year's challenges span five vision-based tasks: (1) Ball Action Anticipation, predicting the timing and class of ball-related actions within a short future window from a preceding observation window; (2) Player-Centric Ball Action Spotting, temporally localizing and classifying ball-related actions while assigning each action to the acting player through team affiliation and jersey number; (3) Novel View Synthesis, rendering images from unobserved camera poses in multi-view football scenes; (4) Spiideo SoccerNet Synloc, localizing athletes in real-world pitch coordinates from a single calibrated static-camera image; and (5) Visual Question Answering, answering multiple-choice questions about football broadcasts across text, image, and video inputs. For each task, participants were provided with annotated data, a unified evaluation protocol, and a public baseline. This edition saw broad participation, with 427 teams submitting 1,129 entries across the five tasks and 28 teams contributing reviewed technical reports. This paper describes each task and its evaluation protocol, presents the challenge leaderboards, and summarizes the leading submissions, with the aim of documenting the current state of each task as measured on held-out challenge data.
